It’s absurd that the SF Supervisors are planning to ban e-cigs, while nonetheless permitting the, “unfettered sale of actual cigarettes”, the precise merchandise that kill over 400,000 Individuals per yr.
After earlier this yr the US FDA issued its much-anticipated pointers close to new restrictions on vaping merchandise, San Francisco’s Metropolis Lawyer had proposed a invoice to ban the sale of all e-cigarettes till this course of is full.
“By regulation, earlier than a brand new tobacco product goes to market, the Meals and Drug Administration is meant to conduct a overview to guage its influence on public well being. Inexplicably, the FDA has didn’t do its job on the subject of e-cigarettes,” mentioned Metropolis Lawyer Dennis Herrera on the time. “Till the FDA does so, San Francisco has to step up. These merchandise shouldn’t be on our cabinets till the FDA has reviewed the risk they pose to public well being.”
Subsequently earlier this month, town’s supervisors authorised the ban in a unanimous preliminary vote. “We spent the 90s battling large tobacco, and now we see its new kind in e-cigarettes,” mentioned supervisor Shamann Walton. “That is about enthusiastic about the following era of customers and enthusiastic about defending the general well being and sending a message to the remainder of the state and the nation: comply with our lead,” added supervisor Ahsha Safaí.
San Francisco’s supervisors “legislative present” to PMI
In response to this, public well being knowledgeable Dr. Michael Siegel, wrote a weblog declaring how if this ban goes by, San Francisco’s supervisors could be donating a “big legislative present” to none apart from Philip Morris – the nation’s largest cigarette producer.
“The Philip Morris USA cigarette firm couldn’t have dreamed for a extra favorable legislative present from town of San Francisco. Proper now, the chief competitor to the sale of the corporate’s lethal cigarettes is vaping merchandise, that are immediately essentially the most broadly used and simplest product for smoking cessation,” mentioned Siegel.
“Actually, there are a minimum of 2.5 million ex-smokers in america who’ve efficiently give up smoking utilizing e-cigarettes and who stay depending on the provision of those merchandise to remain off cigarettes. Nonetheless, in San Francisco, except the Board reverses its resolution, these merchandise will quickly be taken off the market,” he added.
The absurdity of banning vapes while permitting cigarettes
The general public well being knowledgeable identified the way it’s absurd that the San Francisco Board of Supervisors are planning to ban e-cigarettes, while nonetheless permitting the, “unfettered sale of actual cigarettes”, the precise merchandise that kill over 400,000 Individuals per yr. He defined that from a public well being perspective “that is essentially the most insane piece of laws” he has ever seen, as they’re selecting on safer options, while permitting the actual culprits available on the market.
“The San Francisco Metropolis Lawyer argued that e-cigarettes are “a product that shouldn’t even be available on the market.” So let’s get his reasoning straight. He’s saying that e-cigarettes shouldn’t even be available on the market, however cigarettes ought to! That is opposite to each public well being precept within the e book. We purpose to assist the general public make more healthy decisions. Forcing them to devour essentially the most lethal and poisonous client product available on the market is the very last thing on the earth that any coverage maker involved about public well being must be doing.”
Learn Additional: The Remainder of the Story